Which item is an example of a phonological error pattern rather than a motor-speech impairment?

Prepare for the ETS Form 1 Exam. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Ace your exam with confidence!

Multiple Choice

Which item is an example of a phonological error pattern rather than a motor-speech impairment?

Explanation:
Phonological error patterns come from how the sound system is organized, not from the muscles or nerves used to speak. Fronting is a pattern where velar sounds like “k” and “g” are replaced with alveolar sounds like “t” and “d” at the starts of words. That shows a substitution pattern in speech sounds, not a neuromotor problem. Fasciculations are small muscle twitches, reflecting motor-neural activity. Poor tongue mobility points to restricted or weak motor control of the tongue. Inability to perform voluntary movements indicates a broader motor-speech planning or execution impairment. So fronting stands out as a phonological pattern, not a motor-speech impairment.

Phonological error patterns come from how the sound system is organized, not from the muscles or nerves used to speak. Fronting is a pattern where velar sounds like “k” and “g” are replaced with alveolar sounds like “t” and “d” at the starts of words. That shows a substitution pattern in speech sounds, not a neuromotor problem.

Fasciculations are small muscle twitches, reflecting motor-neural activity. Poor tongue mobility points to restricted or weak motor control of the tongue. Inability to perform voluntary movements indicates a broader motor-speech planning or execution impairment. So fronting stands out as a phonological pattern, not a motor-speech impairment.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy